The other, putting in full light the paper of the unconscious one attributing to the libido, to the sexual pulses the great part of the responsibilities for the individual behaviors occulted ambition and the appetite of being able proper of the politician. (REMOND 1988, 2003, P. 20). You criticize concerning them that the Annales makes is of that History politics is a superficial history, of the conjuncture accidents, where they did not hold reality, therefore Economic and Social History, according to Remnd: Its estimated were that the collective behaviors had more importance for the course of the History that the individual initiatives, that the phenomena registered in a long duration were more significant and more decisive than the movements of weak amplitude, and that the realities of the work, the production, of the exchanges, the state of the techniques, the social changes of technology and relations from there resultants had more consequences, and, therefore, had to hold back greater attention of the observers, that regimes politicians or the changes in the identity of the detainers of a power whose decisions, if understood, only made to translate the state of the forces social, or to reflect realities previous choices politics. (REMOND 1988, 2003, p.16.). Still salient Remnd I repudiate concerning it of the Annales: ' ' It was, therefore, probably inevitable that the development of economic and social History if made to the costs of the decline of the history of the facts politicians, from there in ahead launched in a discredit pparently definitivo' '.
(REMOND 1988, 2003, P. 14.). Locked up this point above displayed the author it says of the return or ressurgimento of History politics in years 60 or 70, where in the sample that the facts are linked between itself, that is, the economic one, the social one, the cultural ones are not and nor they can be dissociar of the politician, where all determinative and are determined in the historical process. Moreover, the author believes that the return or ressurgimento of the approach politician if of the one for the fact of the magnifying of the paper of the State the society, and with this, a bigger attention to the facts politicians. The interdisciplinaridade is another point detached in the return of history politics in the questions historiogrficas of the present time, where this usufructs of techniques and methods of similar sciences as it is the case of the mathematics of which it loaned the data static, as well as quantitative history, and also, science politics as great allied in the object relations new to approach. The institutions that had contributed for this renaissance of History Politics had been: VI Section of the cole Pratique de Hautes tudes in Sciences Sociales and the Fondation Nationale you give sciences Politiques. In the direction of the French historiografia Remnd it detaches names as Charles Seignobos and Andres Siegried, where first of its contribution on the diversity of the temperaments politicians and as concerning electoral geography, beyond enaltecer the work of Jean Jaques Chevalier with its boarding on the renaissance of the ideas politics, of the institutions, chains of thought and personalities. In short, author makes a rocking of the trajectory that History politics passed throughout the historical process, in one first moment being hegemonic in the historical explanation, at as the moment receiving you criticize they disqualified that it they placed and it in the ostracism, finishing for at one third moment saying of the return of history politics waiting that this is not only one fashion of the moment or one ' ' veranico of maio' '.