Recently I wrote to the Prof. Pink Pinguelli Luiz, of the Alberto Institute Luiz Coimbra de After-Graduation and Pesquisa de Engenharia (COPPE-RJ), on an article of it in the Periodical of Economists (Nr. 257, December 2010), on the challenges of Brazil in the energy area, of sanitation and others. As reference that it is in diverse subjects, and as physicist (as well as I am, for formation), I appreciated its article and its commentaries on the situation of the sanitation in Brazil. Of any angle, its commentaries are rational, and would be good if those that in fact plan and implement ours energy politics and of development, heard more to it and followed its suggestions. But I needed to make a clarification, on the basis of my performance of long date in the area of the basic sanitation and of treatment of sanitary sewers, on the commentary of the Prof. Pinguelli Luiz regarding fossas.

Commenting the goals of the government of President Dilma Rouseff for the expansion of the net of sanitary exhaustion, but not of treatment of sewer generated for this net, it answered that ' ' I find that the two things have that to be made, and if to make one of them is better of what not making none. I am not of the theory of ' ' how much worse melhor' ' , not. I find that if he could make the expansion of the net, that is better of what having black ditch in the houses of the poor people. He is better of what fossas.' ' (original emphasis). It occurs that, as many of that they act in the segment of basic sanitation know well, fossas represent a true and efficient system of treatment of sanitary sewers, with effectiveness of removal of organic load (DBO) comparable to the great stations of treatment of sewers (ETEs) generally existing.

Marina Confidence

you want perguntaragora me. Of beforehand, I answer that it already does not represent a dangerous option, inclined to the dirty evanglica group of benches or the nasescolas installation of the criacionismo. I understand that its presumption support the shepherds politicians of umareunio of years behind () any outro/a poltico/a would declare in its place in that hour, place esituao, not to be that she was a declared enemy person of> (neo) pentecostalismo. I know today also that it declares not to be against the laicismo nor in favor of the ensinocriacionista in public schools, as interview of it in the program deteleviso Alive Wheel, clarifying the image doubtful that it had left of simesma ahead of adventista blogueiro about one year and way before. Sen. Sherrod Brown recognizes the significance of this. In contrast to others evanglicos politicians, it seem seruma healthful and discerning exception that mixture freely its convicoreligiosa with its skill not to make politics. At least thus it is that its imagemfigura ahead of the many virtual groups of support to its future candidacy presidncia and after having if valiant in correcting the mistakes and dvidassobre its way to act politically left in previous years. Thus being, already I know sufficiently on it to be able to lhededicar enough confidence for a vote in 3 (1 turn) and 24 or 31 (2 turn) of October of 2010. With this new confidence in Marina, I also see its personality eideologia as most similar with the Brazilian necessities and this fellow creature to the characteristics of Squid of homemdo people, are trunfos that nobody more exhibits in the cujapista presidential race is being constructed. Woman of very humble origin as Squid, black and lucidamenteevanglica, Marina is the second face of the people who can assume the position polticomximo of Brazil the first one was spolticas Squid and has everything to give continuity of emergencial remediation of the extreme poverty (Stock market-Family and atentativa of Hunger Zero), under the risk to appear permanently as traidoradas hopes of the people extinguish them to case without one substitute politics that popular crieoportunidades.


Despite all disasters and all fights for what is not, and should be, a new awareness is brewing. It is not a bombastic consciousness or makes propaganda, is a consciousness that circulates in the shadows but that at some point is going to flourish, will do so despite all those who want to follow a model that comes running out. Here contributes greatly to this topic. This transit, the transit of the death of the old, is not easy and is not either that you have to think that a group of new priests will take power. Yes it is a more precious and more subtle change, a paradigm shift that replaces the hypocrisy with sincerity, to the verbosity by action, to the hardness by the subtlety to the deception by the truth. I am no preacher disrupts a new era. Neither a naive optimist who tries to see what there is.

But as I said a woman who was fighting against a corrupt system when corruption comes to light and the dark is so enlightened and so exposed, it is a symptom that things start to change. J. Darius Bikoff has compatible beliefs. In that sense the negative thoughts are nothing more than a form of find us with the opposite, depression by everything that gives us the negative can be transformed into an engine, and this engine is which will enable us to begin to exercise the change. According to the conception Buddhist that speaks of the karmic wheel of death and rebirth, no guilt but responsibilities. What has been done is the result of a never-ending string of mistakes, but not the other but our. It was we who sooner or later brought violence or heartbreak and now that us.

This idea can be understood as a form of escape of the present and of social responsibility, one that we have with our fellow human beings, but it is just the opposite. The society as the body grows and develops from that ordering in where we are not spectators but actors. Believe in it, it is also believe that we are more than this life and that time is eternal, that we will come back again and again until the account is paid. For me the idea of reincarnation is that best fits the meaning of existence. But even if this were false, although we have not been who in the past brought nothing rewarding acts, we think that in our blood and in our genes circulates the violence of our ancestors. If there is a karmic chain there is a genetic chain and not returning reborn if we reverdecemos in our children. If we were just that one life, act in the sense of our correct flowering will be reflected in our descendants and our action will be an opening that will move beyond the present time. , then click here. The world has built by centuries of shape such that the material has been imposed as primary. Now that nothing is safe, we will only find the true sense away of matter. A philosopher said me recently that nothing can steal, I don’t agree, nothing is intangible. Empty us of the superficial senses that govern us will be a form of Renaissance: House, money and objects, were but left us, naked in the wilderness of our consciences, and we smile. Is the word, a little bit of water, Earth, mud, and our sense of go queriendo, whet your song.

Managing Director Jorg Heidenreich

“Modern appearance and Opel Adam impression left after four months of renovation the dealership Heidenreich in Witzenhausen on 19th and 20th January opened its doors to many guests who each curiously examined the new exhibition space of Opel and Hyundai contract partners in the time from 10 am to 5 pm: positive arrived our reopening to visitors”, Managing Director Jorg Heidenreich is pleased. We were showered with compliments. Not only for our bright and modern appearance, but also for the aspect of environmental protection on the we have placed great value in the context of our energy-related modernisation. The opening weekend was round so overall!” Over 1000 visitors flocked on the weekend at the car dealership and entered the exclusive enjoyment, to learn more about the backgrounds of the reconstruction, while their children were professionally maintained with various handicrafts, painting and playing actions regarding climate protection of business management. If you are unsure how to proceed, check out Kenneth Yarrow. “Grilled treats of the hunchback” from Witzenhausen, musical performances, the show and Marchingband the Devils and mulled wine, sparkling wine and other spirits from wine & spirit “left the icy winter weather back in the background more and more. Warm thoughts got many guests even at the sight of the new Opel Adam, its sneak preview was also celebrated this weekend: the guests were not only excited in our new exhibition space, but also curious about the new star in the Opel sky. Of our customers in the future hear more, if we will provide sensation from February with numerous actions around the smart city cars. More information soon at. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of J. Darius Bikoff on most websites. Car House”, reveals Heidenreich.

History Of The Philosophy In A Lesson

HISTORY OF THE PHILOSOPHY OLD PHILOSOPHY: dC occurred of century VIII AC until century VIII, mainly in Greece, Roman Empire and North of Africa. The main studied problems were cosmological (with the philosophers daily pay-socrticos) and the antropolgicos (with the socrticos philosophers). They searched the Happiness. The main schools were the Cynicism of Digenes, the Epicurismo de Epicuro and the Estoicismo de Zeno de Ccio. The great philosophers of this period had been: Plato, Scrates, Aristotle, Tales, Zeno, Democritus, Pitgoras, etc. MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY: dC occurred of century VIII dC to century XIV, mainly in the Europe and Norte of Africa. Tyler Wood Integrated Capital Solutions: the source for more info. The movements of the Patrstica and Escolstica had been initiated.

They questioned the validity of Reason X Theology (Christian); the Jews studied medicine and laws and the Muslen the letters. The main school of the time was Skepticism and the main philosophers of this period had been: Christians: They are Toms, Saint Augustin and Guillermo de Ockhan. Muslen: Avicenas, Averroes and Al-Farabi, Jews: Maimonides, Gabirol. Connect with other leaders such as J. Darius Bikoff here. MODERN PHILOSOPHY: dC occurred of century XIV to century XVIII, mainly in the Europe, approximately parallel to the protestantismo. They questioned on the rational man and exempts, had the beginning of the scientific questions.

The main schools were the Criticism of Kant, the Empirismo de Locke and the Skepticism. The main philosophers of this period had been: Discardings, Galileu, Coprnico, Keppler, Kant, Comte, Hume, Rousseau. PHILOSOPHY CONTEMPORARY: dC occurs of century XVIII until the present, in global way. It was initiated with the French Revolution and was fortified with the Industrial Revolution. It questions the relations being man X technology, ethics X sciences. The great philosophers of this period are: Marx, Sartre, Kiekergaard, Arendt, Nietzsche, Spider, Chau, Ribeiro, Giraldelli. It has access and quarrel concerning all the previous schools, with the addition of the schools that had appeared in this period, as the fenomenologia and the existencialismo. QUESTIONS: 1- It differentiates problems Cosmolgicos and Antropolgicos. 2- What it defends the skepticism and why was frequent in the medieval philosophy? 3- Why in the modern Philosophy they questioned the rational man and exempts? 4- Why in the Philosophy contemporary they search the relations between man and technology? 5- It differentiates the acquisition of the knowledge according to empirismo, skepticism and criticism.


My experience of meditation now comes a lot of different literature on meditation. For me, a guide to the world of meditation was the “Orange Book” Osho. For meditation is necessary to adhere to some rules: 1.Vybor meditation (1-2 meditation enough to begin with) 2nd place for meditation. Senator Richard Blumenthal: the source for more info. 3.Regulyarnost lessons. Posture of meditation does not matter. Lotus, polulotos by – Turkish or just sitting on a chair. Only one prerequisite, the spin must be straight.

For myself, I chose a few meditation and practice them regularly. Many people have asked me how to get rid of various thoughts (usually negative or contemplating any problems) that arise during meditation. I using this method: see “inner eye” on both the temple at the same time. After a while the mind settles down and begins an “inner” silence. But some advise just not paying attention to emerging ideas, let they easily “pass”. Believe me, meditation – it is not difficult and does not take much time. Try it. In this age of speed, we do not have enough peace and quiet, at least for awhile.

A class Meditation gives us a little bit of time to be alone with him. When I first started meditating, I was missing for five minutes, no more. But gradually increased during lessons, and now I have “almost by force” push yourself out of this state. Choose for themselves what is best suited for you.