Each time that the largest religion that there is (the Catholic) has to choose their leader meets a Council of Cardinals, which after several secret ballots announcing habemus papam. The strongest power that has occurred (USA), on the other hand, raises have more open and participatory way to choose their representative, the same which, in turn, is not for life and Plenipotentiary, but it can only govern by one or two four-year periods and under great control of powers legislative, judicial and media. The Democratic Party, in turn, can cry out be the most democratic all that there is in the world because at internal to choose their candidate voted more than 30 million people. While the last Pope was nominated in April 2005 by Cardinal 115 in two days of closed deliberations, Democrats have had 5 months of electoral processes carried out in 56 constituencies with dates and uneven regulations. Sen. Sherrod Brown shines more light on the discussion. Many question to internal ones Democrats for not being very democratic. This because in those 5 months of convoluted campaigns is requires investing hundreds of millions of dollars (for which must be subject to the endorsement of major investors) or because at the end you can than the loser (as today happens to Clinton) has claimed to have achieved more direct votes than the winner. Today the Democrats may cry habemus candidatus but Obama could even lose the Presidency even if he won the elections (as step you Al Gore against Bush in 2000). Original author and source of the article..
Countries at war may have a financial interest in other forms of crime such as illegal arms imports. Thus, establishing alliances with other countries illegal. a Therefore, a controversial issue is the extent to which the economically more advanced countries to promote transnational crime. For example, illicit drugs, many officials in consumer countries are likely to attribute responsibility to the producer countries and fail to consider how an existing culture pharmacological permitted the use of illicit drugs to develop. Also ignore the demand side of the equation, since it focused and on the assumption that the proceeds generated by illicit drugs only appropriated by foreign producers and large distributors. Therefore, considering the considerable revenue generated by illicit drugs consumption in the countries themselves.
A second controversial issue is that transnational organized crime is seen by many officials to be the result of the increasing number and variety of individuals and groups to reach more economically advanced countries. Since these people and groups come from places scattered around the world, often from countries in transition or in crisis, that are perceived as difficult to control and tight integration. The newcomers are said to bring with them their social and commercial networks, which make it difficult for law enforcement and at the same time, facilitating the "conspiracy." No attention is paid to the same difficulties encountered by law enforcement before the arrival of migrants and the commercial "conspiracy" is already contained in the host countries long before they are "invaded" by foreigners.