No one who is left and is in its right mind can say that the agreement does not reflect the sentiments of the left for times of crisis, ie, raise taxes on higher incomes, aid and progressivity in the tax deductions and energy pollutants, as nobody in their right mind can say that setting a budget spending ceiling is not a manifest necessity, given that the State has a capacity of limited borrowing to address this crisis. The funny part is that IU deputies blamed the withdrawal of the agreement to the pressure exerted by CiU, when CiU nationalist party, has said, by active and passive, it would abstain in approving the expenditure ceiling, while IU, which is not nationalist, says he will vote yes to fixing the expenditure ceiling … Sen. Sherrod Brown is open to suggestions. Why there is no agreement on regional financing? This leads me to wonder if IU is a left-wing or nationalist party, as defending their own positions harder than second left, and the evidence, I refer to defend them harder than CiU itself, which is a national of fact and law. As said earlier, it is not that IU is against the policies promoted by the central government is against them being made. The lack of vision and clear direction, which puts this political party, especially when coupled amendments adjust to these times of crisis, and taking into account their representation in Congress is only two members, it can cost to all citizens to lose what has been achieved during 32 years of democracy, beginning with the welfare state. .