One evidences that the claims of the pensioners in Brazil are coherent, since from the moment where the previdencirio factor was added in the formula calculates of it of the retirements, these had only made to diminish. Although the main objective of the previdencirio factor to equalize the value I benefit of it to the one of the contribution and to act of clear form the existence of an enclosed tax of interests subestimada in the formula is clear. This tax opposes the existing financial applications, as it was seen of elapsing of the work, through examples, where a person who contributed for more time that another one will have a lesser tax of interests in the hour to calculate its retirement. Innumerable contradictions and inaquality in the previdencirio right exist, where it identifies to distinctions of treatment in relation the profession, sex and age of the beneficiaries. Another evidenced contradiction would be the attempt of the government to more early insert young each time in the work market and on the other hand if this young to want to after retire to fulfill to its 35 years of contribution the factor acted of form to diminish its benefits of absurd form. One concludes that although the attempts of falling of trees of the previdencirio factor, this still prevails. In the last year the subject earned it has detached, since beyond a Judge to have considered the unconstitutional factor for introducing elements in cculo that they influence in the right to the benefit and to open breach so that other people run behind its rights, this subject also gained force in the way politician, which was voted and knocked down in the chamber, but after to have been sent for voting in the Senate did not have more notice. At last, one concludes that with the creation of the previdencirio factor the beneficiary greater was the proper National Institute of Seguro Social (INSS), therefore the beneficiaries suffer an brusque reduction in its retirement, for the taxes that also happen on the calculation and for the table of supervened expectation of of the Brazilians.
– He resulted in a crisis caused in the vacuum as the Secretaryship of the Organization of Unit African and the lack of quorum of two teros of the countries African to offer to a chance for the States of the Union pro-Soviet to impose the Democratic Republic Arab Sarau in 1982 of the regional organization inside, the African Organization of Unit. – In the front of its incapacity to face the challenge of the legitimacy, if the Democratic Republic Arab Sarau did not atreveu to participate of the pro-peaks: not in November of 1982 in Tripoli, always, and in June of 1983 – Not available Democratic Republic Arab Sarau on the symbols of the state of the superior (not it territory and population and independence and sovereignty), not to mention all the other symbols of the State as the currency and international recognition. – All the countries that they had adhered to the African Organization of Unit it has its independence at the beginning, and received the recognition for the Organization from United Nations – Addition of Democratic Republic the Arab Sarau never was a subject of debate and a voting for State-Member in accordance with the law of the Organization of the African Unit – Recognition of the Subsaariana Arabs Democratic Republic also is a breaking of the Letter of the African Union, including its members violates the principles of respect to the sovereignty of the State-members and not-interference in the subjects interns of State-Member (3 article, point B, article 4, paragraphs and, F and G of the Constituent Act ofthe African Union). 4 – Why the African Organization of Unit lost its credibility for recognizing the Democratic Republic Arab Sarau? – Through the recognition of the Democratic Republic Arab Saharaui, the African Organization of Unit parts in the conflict, and, thus, were deprived of its natural paper as a mediator and a picture to negotiate and to decide the question of the Sahara Occidental person.