But there is a contrary view. Previous crises reinvestment was so global, that he would return to the previous rate of growth of the economy will not soon Optimists believe the crisis to restore justice. Pros: it's time to stop living in debt, inflating the financial bubble and immensely consume. Pessimists also believe that the end does not justify the means, and the price of sobering up too high. That only is unemployment, the turbulence of financial markets, the decline in production and increase confidence in the financial system as a whole.

This is not a step back, it's just the destruction of the architecture architecture relationships in the business world! Experts do not agree, and in the opinion whether there is any substantial restructuring of the economy country because of the crisis. Supporters believe the optimistic approach to the top of the optimization process. Pessimists tend to think that significant changes in control methods and approaches has not happened. Many companies send employees on leave without content, even redrew the staffing and nothing touching on the fundamental level. And maybe learn from China and develop investment in its own production at a sufficiently hard-state regulation? One can argue about the role of government in a market economy, but the socio-economic and political stability are not exactly necessities. Share the positive experience of countries is certainly useful. But and sovereignty should not be forgotten. In the search for the "golden mean" it is important to remember one's competitive advantages: vast natural resources, scientific potential and uniqueness of the mentality of Russian citizens.