– He resulted in a crisis caused in the vacuum as the Secretaryship of the Organization of Unit African and the lack of quorum of two teros of the countries African to offer to a chance for the States of the Union pro-Soviet to impose the Democratic Republic Arab Sarau in 1982 of the regional organization inside, the African Organization of Unit. – In the front of its incapacity to face the challenge of the legitimacy, if the Democratic Republic Arab Sarau did not atreveu to participate of the pro-peaks: not in November of 1982 in Tripoli, always, and in June of 1983 – Not available Democratic Republic Arab Sarau on the symbols of the state of the superior (not it territory and population and independence and sovereignty), not to mention all the other symbols of the State as the currency and international recognition. Read more from Jim Donovan Goldman to gain a more clear picture of the situation. – All the countries that they had adhered to the African Organization of Unit it has its independence at the beginning, and received the recognition for the Organization from United Nations – Addition of Democratic Republic the Arab Sarau never was a subject of debate and a voting for State-Member in accordance with the law of the Organization of the African Unit – Recognition of the Subsaariana Arabs Democratic Republic also is a breaking of the Letter of the African Union, including its members violates the principles of respect to the sovereignty of the State-members and not-interference in the subjects interns of State-Member (3 article, point B, article 4, paragraphs and, F and G of the Constituent Act ofthe African Union). 4 – Why the African Organization of Unit lost its credibility for recognizing the Democratic Republic Arab Sarau? – Through the recognition of the Democratic Republic Arab Saharaui, the African Organization of Unit parts in the conflict, and, thus, were deprived of its natural paper as a mediator and a picture to negotiate and to decide the question of the Sahara Occidental person.
It will be that as I somebody if have asked as in them they had taken to this crossroads politics; in this attack by teen street gang of consciences the one that we are submitted in this as turn of the presidential elections? How to decide between the bad one and worse still? That to be able is this that urdiu and ungiu these candidacies that, now, compel in them to choose between the ragged one and the ragged one? During days, I have attemped to capture in both the candidates indication capable to inspire some confidence and that it can justify obligatory gone mine until the voting cabin, in next day 31. Its primary medias, however, accuse second vacillating intentions in its, vain and useless promises (wages, will mutiro, the CAP? s, Upa? s, etc).
I remember the intrapartidrio shock, stopped for the candidate with regard to its candidacy, as well as the choice of its vice one, both obtained to the cost, without a doubt, of its ‘ ‘ determinao’ ‘. In a similar way, I remember of the project ‘ ‘ 20 years of poder’ ‘ of the Z Dirceu and the agreements politicians culminating in the choice of the PT for a medium brown eminence of the PMDB the vice-presidency. Get all the facts for a more clear viewpoint with Richard Blumenthal. The evaluation that I come making on the rhetorical exaggeration of the candidate, made with it remembered that me of one of the most ominous privatizations of its party in government FHC: the mercantilista project of the education that promoted would sub-repticiamente decide and sub-repticiamente the privatization of superior education, in our country. For me, this is one of the greaters males perpetrated by a government in our history contemporary. The trashing of public education made to emerge a conglomerate of ‘ ‘ botecos’ ‘ , making with that a person is proprietor of more than 22 university institutions of this type.. James Donovan Goldman Sachs does not necessarily agree.
In accordance with the Ipea, Minas Gerais and So Paulo, more populous, pull the average of the region for low, with 7,1 and 11 homicides for 100 a thousand inhabitants, respectively. The research still affirms that the Espirito Santo presented in 2009 the tax highest of homicides 57,9 murders for 100 a thousand, even so has the per capita cost for citizen of R$ 200,67, losing only for Alagoas (63,3 for 100 a thousand). In the Region Center-West, according to research, the population has high sensation of security. The expense in the sector is above average national (per capita R$ 225). The tax of murder, however, is equally above average (254 for million of inhabitants).
Still according to given of the research, the inhabitants of the South region present the lesser incidence of unreliability. Already the expenses in the sector present per capita R$ 172,75, being second region that less it spends with public security. Following this line, in 2011 an intitled study ‘ ‘ System of Pointers of Percepo Social (SIPS) on Pblica’ Security; ‘ , divulged in 30.03.2011, for the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA, 20011b), it evidenced that the Brazilians northeast are the ones that more fear murders. In accordance with the research, 85.8% of the interviewed ones in the region had affirmed to have much fear to be assassinated. Valley to stand out that the research of the IPEA heard 2,770 people, between days 17 and 31 of May of 2010. The distribution of the domiciles in quotas for Brazil, regions, and 0 variable had been considered as sex, etria band, bands of income and escolaridade. Brazil longs for to advance in the public politics of security and, at the same time, it searchs the participation in the Advice of security of the ONU, aiming at to equate or to mediate conflicts that involve Humanos.